Some more mainstream coverage that actually has the potential to make a positive difference in a lot of lives.

Today in The New York Times:
How Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat“.

This is a report on the special communication article releases today on JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association):
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research“, authored by Cristin E. Kearns (the dentist from “Sugar Coated” who stumbled on the sugary version of the Holy Grail), Laura A. Schmidt and Stanton A. Glantz.


Here is the abstract, I hope you read the rest, too:

Early warning signals of the coronary heart disease (CHD) risk of sugar (sucrose) emerged in the 1950s. We examined Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) internal documents, historical reports, and statements relevant to early debates about the dietary causes of CHD and assembled findings chronologically into a narrative case study. The SRF sponsored its first CHD research project in 1965, a literature review published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which singled out fat and cholesterol as the dietary causes of CHD and downplayed evidence that sucrose consumption was also a risk factor. The SRF set the review’s objective, contributed articles for inclusion, and received drafts. The SRF’s funding and role was not disclosed. Together with other recent analyses of sugar industry documents, our findings suggest the industry sponsored a research program in the 1960s and 1970s that successfully cast doubt about the hazards of sucrose while promoting fat as the dietary culprit in CHD. Policymaking committees should consider giving less weight to food industry–funded studies and include mechanistic and animal studies as well as studies appraising the effect of added sugars on multiple CHD biomarkers and disease development.